Every paper checked — nothing hidden

All papers

Every paper checked for brief #4 of 12–19 Oct 2026 — nothing is hidden. Brief papers first.

Switch to weekly view
PaperTopicRelevanceFeedback
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not related to programming, software maintenance, or code.
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Introduces a conversational framework, not general benchmark evaluation.
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not cover model pruning, quantization, or efficient serving.
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on conversation support alignment, not multi-step tool-use agents.
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on conversational empathy, not guardrails or safety attacks.
FACES: Fine-grained Gated Semantic Alignment for Multimodal Emotional Support Conversation
The paper introduces a gated semantic alignment framework with multi-source rewards to improve multimodal emotional support conversations.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not involve external retrieval or knowledge base grounding.
What Is a Clarification? Estimating Model-Dependent Input Ambiguity
The paper formalizes clarification criteria to estimate model-dependent input ambiguity based on accessible and valid answers.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not explore retrieval augmentation or external knowledge grounding.
What Is a Clarification? Estimating Model-Dependent Input Ambiguity
The paper formalizes clarification criteria to estimate model-dependent input ambiguity based on accessible and valid answers.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Examines ambiguity estimation, not multi-step autonomous planning agents.
What Is a Clarification? Estimating Model-Dependent Input Ambiguity
The paper formalizes clarification criteria to estimate model-dependent input ambiguity based on accessible and valid answers.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address model compression, quantization, or efficient serving.
What Is a Clarification? Estimating Model-Dependent Input Ambiguity
The paper formalizes clarification criteria to estimate model-dependent input ambiguity based on accessible and valid answers.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Uses Text-to-SQL as an evaluation setting, not code generation.
What Is a Clarification? Estimating Model-Dependent Input Ambiguity
The paper formalizes clarification criteria to estimate model-dependent input ambiguity based on accessible and valid answers.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on text QA and SQL ambiguities, not multimodality.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on text pre-training, not multimodal or vision tasks.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not related to code generation or software engineering tasks.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Addresses multilingual data ordering, not safety or guardrails.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on pre-training regimens, not benchmark evaluation methodology.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Examines multilingual pre-training data schedules, not autonomous agents.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
The paper evaluates how language exposure distribution and ordering affect the performance of multilingual models trained with limited data.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address external database retrieval or grounding.
Why Generate a Click? Plug-in Decision Heads for Web Agents
This paper introduces plug-in decision heads that read action choices directly from visual agent hidden states rather than generating text tokens.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on web agent execution efficiency, not safety guardrails.
Why Generate a Click? Plug-in Decision Heads for Web Agents
This paper introduces plug-in decision heads that read action choices directly from visual agent hidden states rather than generating text tokens.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Evaluates web agent performance, but focus is on architecture.
Why Generate a Click? Plug-in Decision Heads for Web Agents
This paper introduces plug-in decision heads that read action choices directly from visual agent hidden states rather than generating text tokens.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on GUI web navigation, not software code writing.
Why Generate a Click? Plug-in Decision Heads for Web Agents
This paper introduces plug-in decision heads that read action choices directly from visual agent hidden states rather than generating text tokens.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not focus on document retrieval or external knowledge bases.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Surveys mechanistic interpretability methods, not autonomous tool-using agents.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Surveys feature interpretability, not standard LLM evaluation benchmarks.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not focus on retrieval-augmented generation systems.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Covers interpretability analysis rather than serving or inference efficiency.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on language model feature representations, not multimodal models.
Sparse Autoencoders for Mechanistic Interpretability in NLP: A Critical Survey of Recoverability, Interpretability, and Utility
This paper surveys 138 studies on sparse autoencoders in NLP, examining dictionary design, feature recoverability, and practical utility.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not target software engineering or code LLMs.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on response diversity, not deployment safety or jailbreaks.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address external document retrieval or grounding.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not related to coding assistants or software repair.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on embedding search for diverse generation, not agents.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Deals with text embedding spaces and language generation.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not cover model compression, pruning, or quantization.
Gap Detection: Mitigating Homogenization through Demand and Defensibility
This paper introduces Gap Detection, an optimization method that identifies unoccupied semantic directions to reduce homogenization in open-ended model answers.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on generation diversity rather than benchmark evaluation.
RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
This paper presents RM-OPD, a framework that trains domain-specialized reward models via on-policy distillation into a generalist model.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Develops generative reward models, not general evaluation benchmarks.
RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
This paper presents RM-OPD, a framework that trains domain-specialized reward models via on-policy distillation into a generalist model.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not focused on code synthesis, inspection, or program repair.
RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
This paper presents RM-OPD, a framework that trains domain-specialized reward models via on-policy distillation into a generalist model.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on reward model distillation, not autonomous planning agents.
RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
This paper presents RM-OPD, a framework that trains domain-specialized reward models via on-policy distillation into a generalist model.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Targets text preference reward models, not multimodal tasks.
RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
This paper presents RM-OPD, a framework that trains domain-specialized reward models via on-policy distillation into a generalist model.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address document retrieval or knowledge augmentation.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on inference acceleration rather than evaluation metrics.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Accelerates token generation without addressing AI safety or guardrails.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not involve external retrieval or knowledge bases.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on text LLM speculative decoding, not multimodal models.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Addresses general speculative decoding, not software engineering models.
TreeSpark: Learning to Draft the Trees You Verify for Speculative Decoding
This paper introduces TreeSpark, a framework training semi-autoregressive drafters to generate candidate trees aligned with speculative verification.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on speculative decoding speed, not autonomous agentic systems.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address model efficiency, quantization, or distillation.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Analyzes career path prediction models, not planning agents.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on career trajectory tasks rather than LLM benchmarks.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not focused on safety, prompt injection, or hallucination.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Uses textual job descriptions, without vision or speech modalities.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not examine retrieval-augmented generation architectures.
When Occupation-derived Skills Don't Help: On the Limits of Skill-Augmented Career Path Prediction
This paper analyzes career path prediction systems, reporting that explicit skill representations provide marginal improvement over text-only job descriptions.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not related to code generation or software development.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on multilingual text scaling, not cross-modal processing.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on scaling laws, not safety, guardrails, or hallucination.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not address external retrieval or grounding techniques.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Investigates scaling laws rather than benchmark evaluation reliability.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Focuses on multilingual mixture-of-experts architecture, not agents.
Scaling Multilingual Mixture-of-Experts: How Language Coverage Changes Capacity and Compute Allocation
This paper proposes a joint scaling law evaluating how adding experts in multilingual mixture-of-experts models affects language capacity and loss penalties.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Not focused on software engineering or code modeling.
Repairing Speech Access After Text Updates with Frozen Affine Fields
This paper introduces AFFIRM, using affine fields on frozen speech models to repair spoken access to recently updated text knowledge.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Does not study model compression, pruning, or quantization.
Repairing Speech Access After Text Updates with Frozen Affine Fields
This paper introduces AFFIRM, using affine fields on frozen speech models to repair spoken access to recently updated text knowledge.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 15:06
Not relevant
Addresses cross-modal knowledge updates, not AI safety or jailbreaks.
3,541–3,600 of 13,754← PreviousNext →