Every paper checked — nothing hidden
All papers
Every paper checked for brief #4 of 12–19 Oct 2026 — nothing is hidden. Brief papers first.
All17,313In brief24More (on-topic)3,333Not relevant13,754Not assessed87Older352Could not confirm93Blogs with no paper266All blogs284
| Paper | Topic | Relevance | Feedback |
|---|---|---|---|
| AutoIndexer: Flexible-Order Decoding by Training Causal Models on Chains of Edits Introduces a generative model that allows flexible post-hoc text editing through learned insertion, substitution, and deletion operations. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Tests code correction only as a generic text editing application; main focus is decoding architecture. | |
| Know What You Don't Know: Agentic Data Synthesis by Evolving Generation Space for Closed-Loop Learning Proposes a multi-agent framework that evolves the data generation space using learner feedback to synthesize agent training trajectories. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Addresses training data generation rather than AI safety or guardrails. | |
| Know What You Don't Know: Agentic Data Synthesis by Evolving Generation Space for Closed-Loop Learning Proposes a multi-agent framework that evolves the data generation space using learner feedback to synthesize agent training trajectories. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Introduces a data synthesis framework for training agents, not an evaluation benchmark. | |
| SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire Presents a benchmark evaluating agentic large language models on long-horizon strategic reasoning in the game Slay the Spire. Preprint | Multimodal models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on text-based strategic game reasoning, not multimodal perception. | |
| SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire Presents a benchmark evaluating agentic large language models on long-horizon strategic reasoning in the game Slay the Spire. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies gameplay strategy and evaluation rather than safety, guardrails, or alignment. | |
| SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire Presents a benchmark evaluating agentic large language models on long-horizon strategic reasoning in the game Slay the Spire. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not study model compression, distillation, or inference optimization. | |
| SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire Presents a benchmark evaluating agentic large language models on long-horizon strategic reasoning in the game Slay the Spire. Preprint | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on strategic game playing, not retrieval-augmented generation. | |
| SpireBench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Strategic Play of Agentic Models with Slay the Spire Presents a benchmark evaluating agentic large language models on long-horizon strategic reasoning in the game Slay the Spire. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not involve software engineering or code generation. | |
| Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents Introduces behavioral self-rewarding to refine reinforcement learning feedback for software engineering agents by comparing execution trajectories. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Uses SWE-bench to train and evaluate agents rather than proposing a new benchmark methodology. | |
| Beyond Binary Verifiable Rewards: Behavioral Self-Rewarding for SWE Agents Introduces behavioral self-rewarding to refine reinforcement learning feedback for software engineering agents by comparing execution trajectories. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on code debugging performance rather than security vulnerabilities or deployment safety. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on continual learning methods rather than an LLM evaluation benchmark or judge system. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Not specifically about code generation or software engineering. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies capability retention across instruction tuning rather than efficiency, quantization, or distillation. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies catastrophic forgetting rather than safety, red-teaming, or guardrails. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Examines continual instruction tuning and replay, not retrieval-augmented generation. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | Multimodal models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on language models and instruction tuning, not multimodal systems. | |
| Self-Preservation in Language Models Investigates self-preservation in language models by using task banks to steer synthetic replay during continual instruction tuning. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Investigates continual learning and catastrophic forgetting in LLMs, not autonomous agents. | |
| Mesh-Native Tokenisation: Retrofitting Foundation Models to Unstructured Data Proposes a mesh-native tokenization approach to adapt foundation model architectures to unstructured scientific simulation data. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Presents an architecture for physics data, not an LLM benchmark or evaluation methodology. | |
| Mesh-Native Tokenisation: Retrofitting Foundation Models to Unstructured Data Proposes a mesh-native tokenization approach to adapt foundation model architectures to unstructured scientific simulation data. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on tokenisation for physics PDE emulators, not language model agents. | |
| Mesh-Native Tokenisation: Retrofitting Foundation Models to Unstructured Data Proposes a mesh-native tokenization approach to adapt foundation model architectures to unstructured scientific simulation data. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Not related to deployment safety, guardrails, or alignment. | |
| Machine Learning and Time-Series Foundation Models for Day-Ahead Electricity Forecasting in a University Building Benchmarks machine learning and pretrained foundation models for day-ahead electricity forecasting in a university building. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Not related to AI safety, hallucination, or adversarial robustness. | |
| Machine Learning and Time-Series Foundation Models for Day-Ahead Electricity Forecasting in a University Building Benchmarks machine learning and pretrained foundation models for day-ahead electricity forecasting in a university building. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Applies time-series models to electricity forecasting without agent planning or tool use. | |
| Machine Learning and Time-Series Foundation Models for Day-Ahead Electricity Forecasting in a University Building Benchmarks machine learning and pretrained foundation models for day-ahead electricity forecasting in a university building. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant An applied forecasting case study, not a benchmark or evaluation method for LLMs. | |
| Machine Learning and Time-Series Foundation Models for Day-Ahead Electricity Forecasting in a University Building Benchmarks machine learning and pretrained foundation models for day-ahead electricity forecasting in a university building. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Compares existing forecasting models rather than developing small or efficient language models. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not study small models or inference efficiency. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Not focused on code generation or software engineering tasks. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on introducing and demonstrating an attack mechanism, not an evaluation benchmark. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Not related to retrieval-augmented generation. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies backdoor attacks on LLMs rather than autonomous agent systems or planning. | |
| Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller Demonstrates a backdoor attack where malicious reasoning degradation is triggered incrementally using invisible prompt tokens and stage tracking. Preprint | Multimodal models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on textual LLM backdoor attacks, not multimodal systems. | |
| CLEAT: Learning Value-Guided Clarification for Interactive Agents Co-trains an interactive agent's task policy with a clarification-value controller to optimize when to ask follow-up questions. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Develops a co-training framework for interactive agents rather than an evaluation benchmark. | |
| CLEAT: Learning Value-Guided Clarification for Interactive Agents Co-trains an interactive agent's task policy with a clarification-value controller to optimize when to ask follow-up questions. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies interactive task execution and intent clarification rather than safety risks or guardrails. | |
| Kronecker Product Attention: Memory-Efficient KV Compression via Structured Factorization Introduces a key-value cache compression method representing attention activations as sums of compact Kronecker products. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Presents an attention architecture, not an evaluation framework or benchmark. | |
| Kronecker Product Attention: Memory-Efficient KV Compression via Structured Factorization Introduces a key-value cache compression method representing attention activations as sums of compact Kronecker products. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on attention-level KV cache compression, not LLM agents or planning. | |
| Kronecker Product Attention: Memory-Efficient KV Compression via Structured Factorization Introduces a key-value cache compression method representing attention activations as sums of compact Kronecker products. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not address safety, reliability, or guardrails. | |
| MagicBeanStalk: Escaping the RLVR Zero Advantage Trap with Recursive Data Synthesis Analyzes zero-advantage training plateaus in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and proposes recursive data synthesis to address them. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Investigates RLVR training dynamics rather than deployment safety, jailbreaks, or red-teaming. | |
| MagicBeanStalk: Escaping the RLVR Zero Advantage Trap with Recursive Data Synthesis Analyzes zero-advantage training plateaus in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and proposes recursive data synthesis to address them. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Analyzes RLVR training data synthesis rather than proposing a general LLM evaluation benchmark. | |
| MagicBeanStalk: Escaping the RLVR Zero Advantage Trap with Recursive Data Synthesis Analyzes zero-advantage training plateaus in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and proposes recursive data synthesis to address them. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on training data synthesis for RLVR reasoning, not agent workflows or multi-agent systems. | |
| MagicBeanStalk: Escaping the RLVR Zero Advantage Trap with Recursive Data Synthesis Analyzes zero-advantage training plateaus in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and proposes recursive data synthesis to address them. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not focus on small models, distillation, or hardware-efficient serving. | |
| Incremental Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Human-in-the-Loop Decision Support Evaluates an incremental retrieval-augmented generation framework that progressively populates its knowledge base from human decision precedents. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Addresses human-in-the-loop decision support, but main focus is RAG workflow rather than safety or guardrails. | |
| Incremental Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Human-in-the-Loop Decision Support Evaluates an incremental retrieval-augmented generation framework that progressively populates its knowledge base from human decision precedents. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Presents an incremental RAG system rather than a new evaluation framework or benchmark. | |
| Incremental Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Human-in-the-Loop Decision Support Evaluates an incremental retrieval-augmented generation framework that progressively populates its knowledge base from human decision precedents. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on a decision-support retrieval framework rather than autonomous multi-step agents or tool use. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on continual learning performance rather than deployment safety, guardrails, or alignment. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Evaluates on existing benchmarks rather than proposing a new evaluation methodology or benchmark. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on agent reflection revision, not standard RAG knowledge base retrieval or grounding. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not study model compression, distillation, or inference acceleration. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not specifically target code generation or software engineering agents. | |
| Recurrent Harness for Agentic Continual Learning Proposes a recurrent harness framework that uses streaming feedback to revise textual memory for continual agent learning. Preprint | Multimodal models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not involve multimodal or vision-language models. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Evaluates dataset requirement elicitation, not autonomous planning, multi-step actions, or tool use. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | Multimodal models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on natural language queries for geospatial data, not vision-language or multimodal models. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | AI safety and reliability in deployment via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not focus on safety, jailbreaks, prompt injection, or guardrails. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not study code generation, code repair, or programming assistants. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on identifying geospatial requirement metadata rather than end-to-end RAG architecture or retrieval grounding. | |
| GeoFitBench-LLM: A Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Capabilities in Geospatial Data Requirements Elicitation for Geo-Analytic Tasks Introduces a benchmark evaluating language models on eliciting geospatial data requirements and constraints from natural language requests. Peer-reviewed | Small and efficient models via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Does not focus on model efficiency, distillation, or quantization. | |
| Unsupervised Multimodal Reward Modeling Trains an unsupervised vision-language reward model using intermediate layer representations and caption perturbations without human preference labels. Preprint | LLMs for code via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Applies reward modeling to vision-language captions, not code generation. | |
| Unsupervised Multimodal Reward Modeling Trains an unsupervised vision-language reward model using intermediate layer representations and caption perturbations without human preference labels. Preprint | Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Studies vision-language reward modeling, not retrieval-augmented generation. | |
| Unsupervised Multimodal Reward Modeling Trains an unsupervised vision-language reward model using intermediate layer representations and caption perturbations without human preference labels. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on reward modeling for VLMs, not autonomous multi-step agents. | |
| Unsupervised Multimodal Reward Modeling Trains an unsupervised vision-language reward model using intermediate layer representations and caption perturbations without human preference labels. Preprint | LLM evaluation and benchmarks via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Presents a training method for reward models rather than an LLM evaluation benchmark. | |
| Unsupervised Multimodal Reward Modeling Trains an unsupervised vision-language reward model using intermediate layer representations and caption perturbations without human preference labels. Preprint | Computer vision for industrial applications via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Focuses on general vision-language reward modeling, not industrial inspection or defect detection. | |
| KITE: A Knowledge-Injected Temporal Encoder for Time-Series Event Forecasting Develops a temporal encoder injecting engineering domain priors to forecast rare, high-cost events in multivariate time series. Preprint | AI agents via arxiv · 12 Oct, 16:28 | Not relevant Proposes a time-series forecasting architecture, not language model agents or planning. |
13,261–13,320 of 13,754← PreviousNext →