Every paper checked — nothing hidden

All papers

Every paper checked for brief #4 of 12–19 Oct 2026 — nothing is hidden. Brief papers first.

Switch to weekly view
PaperTopicRelevanceFeedback
RegExtract: A Benchmark for PFAS Regulatory Information Extraction with LLMs
The paper introduces an information extraction benchmark for extracting structured regulatory fields and source provenance from dense environmental policy documents.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies prompting and extraction methods, not model efficiency.
Lumen-bench: Cross-Lingual Safety Gaps and the Say-Do Problem in Tool-Calling Large Language Models
The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark evaluating safety and discrepancies between verbal refusals and tool actions in tool-calling language models.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Evaluates tool use and refusal, not software engineering.
Lumen-bench: Cross-Lingual Safety Gaps and the Say-Do Problem in Tool-Calling Large Language Models
The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark evaluating safety and discrepancies between verbal refusals and tool actions in tool-calling language models.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not address model compression, quantization, or distillation.
Lumen-bench: Cross-Lingual Safety Gaps and the Say-Do Problem in Tool-Calling Large Language Models
The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark evaluating safety and discrepancies between verbal refusals and tool actions in tool-calling language models.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Text and tool-calling benchmark without multimodal components.
Lumen-bench: Cross-Lingual Safety Gaps and the Say-Do Problem in Tool-Calling Large Language Models
The paper introduces a multilingual benchmark evaluating safety and discrepancies between verbal refusals and tool actions in tool-calling language models.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on tool-calling safety rather than retrieval-augmented grounding.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Analyzes compute scaling laws rather than LLM evaluation benchmarks.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies spiking neural network scaling, not LLM agents.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Examines compute scaling tradeoffs rather than deployment safety guardrails.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on text language modeling without multimodal components.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Examines general language modeling scaling laws, not code generation.
Compute-Optimal Scaling Laws for Spiking Language Models
The paper presents an empirical scaling law study measuring parameter and compute trade-offs in spiking neural network language models.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not investigate retrieval-augmented generation architectures.
Where Did We Go Wrong? Localizing Errors to Repair Multi-Turn Conversations
The paper presents a framework to probabilistically localize user-intent misinterpretations and repair conversational states in multi-turn assistant systems.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not cover model quantization, pruning, or efficient inference.
Where Did We Go Wrong? Localizing Errors to Repair Multi-Turn Conversations
The paper presents a framework to probabilistically localize user-intent misinterpretations and repair conversational states in multi-turn assistant systems.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not address external document retrieval or augmented generation.
Where Did We Go Wrong? Localizing Errors to Repair Multi-Turn Conversations
The paper presents a framework to probabilistically localize user-intent misinterpretations and repair conversational states in multi-turn assistant systems.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Deals with conversational assistant state repair, not code generation.
Where Did We Go Wrong? Localizing Errors to Repair Multi-Turn Conversations
The paper presents a framework to probabilistically localize user-intent misinterpretations and repair conversational states in multi-turn assistant systems.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Presents an error-recovery framework rather than an evaluation benchmark.
Where Did We Go Wrong? Localizing Errors to Repair Multi-Turn Conversations
The paper presents a framework to probabilistically localize user-intent misinterpretations and repair conversational states in multi-turn assistant systems.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Addresses text dialogue interactions without multimodal processing.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies propositional text linking without multimodal inputs.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Proposes a linking architecture rather than an evaluation benchmark.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on propositional linking in NLI, not agentic planning.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Applies to natural language inference rather than software code.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not study model pruning, quantization, or efficient serving.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on symbolic inference accuracy rather than deployment safety.
Learning Proposition-Level Links from Sentence-Level Supervision for Neuro-Symbolic NLI
The paper proposes a trainable proposition linker that learns atom-level semantic links from sentence-level supervision for neuro-symbolic inference.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Deals with natural language inference, not RAG architectures.
Sanzaru: Benchmarking Protocol Formation under Epistemic & Communication Asymmetry
The paper introduces a benchmark evaluating how multi-agent teams develop communication protocols under asymmetric information and restricted communication channels.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Measures multi-agent coordination rather than safety red-teaming or guardrails.
Sanzaru: Benchmarking Protocol Formation under Epistemic & Communication Asymmetry
The paper introduces a benchmark evaluating how multi-agent teams develop communication protocols under asymmetric information and restricted communication channels.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not involve external document retrieval or grounding systems.
Sanzaru: Benchmarking Protocol Formation under Epistemic & Communication Asymmetry
The paper introduces a benchmark evaluating how multi-agent teams develop communication protocols under asymmetric information and restricted communication channels.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on cooperative puzzle communication, not software coding.
Sanzaru: Benchmarking Protocol Formation under Epistemic & Communication Asymmetry
The paper introduces a benchmark evaluating how multi-agent teams develop communication protocols under asymmetric information and restricted communication channels.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on communicative interaction rather than multimodal vision-language models.
Sanzaru: Benchmarking Protocol Formation under Epistemic & Communication Asymmetry
The paper introduces a benchmark evaluating how multi-agent teams develop communication protocols under asymmetric information and restricted communication channels.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not examine model compression or inference efficiency.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Uses text document corpora without multimodal integration.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies active learning sampling algorithms, not LLM agent systems.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on classification active learning, not retrieval-augmented generation.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Addresses dataset active learning rather than AI deployment safety risks.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Evaluates document classification datasets, not software engineering tasks.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on data labeling strategies, not efficient model architectures.
Active Learning for Finding a Needle in a Haystack
The paper evaluates whether active learning strategies can overcome initial selection biases when identifying rare document classes in large text corpora.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Evaluates active learning algorithms rather than LLM benchmark design.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Investigates speech prosody rather than software code generation.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not explore document retrieval or RAG systems.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Evaluates acoustic biomarkers rather than language model benchmarks.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies clinical speech prosody metrics, not LLM agents.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not focus on model compression, pruning, or efficient inference.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on clinical depression detection rather than AI deployment safety.
Word-Aligned Prosody Reflects Speaker Differences More Than Depression or PTSD Severity
The paper investigates whether word-aligned prosodic speech measurements reflect speaker identity traits more strongly than depression or PTSD severity.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies acoustic prosody analysis rather than multimodal vision-language models.
SAFE-KV: Causal Suffix Repair for Behavior-Preserving Non-Prefix KV Cache Reuse in RAG
The paper presents a repair method that re-encodes causal suffixes to enable safe non-prefix KV-cache reuse in retrieval-augmented generation.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on text document KV caches without multimodal inputs.
SAFE-KV: Causal Suffix Repair for Behavior-Preserving Non-Prefix KV Cache Reuse in RAG
The paper presents a repair method that re-encodes causal suffixes to enable safe non-prefix KV-cache reuse in retrieval-augmented generation.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on KV cache state reuse rather than multi-step agents.
SAFE-KV: Causal Suffix Repair for Behavior-Preserving Non-Prefix KV Cache Reuse in RAG
The paper presents a repair method that re-encodes causal suffixes to enable safe non-prefix KV-cache reuse in retrieval-augmented generation.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Introduces a cache repair technique rather than an evaluation benchmark.
SAFE-KV: Causal Suffix Repair for Behavior-Preserving Non-Prefix KV Cache Reuse in RAG
The paper presents a repair method that re-encodes causal suffixes to enable safe non-prefix KV-cache reuse in retrieval-augmented generation.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Optimizes attention KV cache serving, not software engineering.
SAFE-KV: Causal Suffix Repair for Behavior-Preserving Non-Prefix KV Cache Reuse in RAG
The paper presents a repair method that re-encodes causal suffixes to enable safe non-prefix KV-cache reuse in retrieval-augmented generation.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Optimizes serving performance rather than AI safety or guardrails.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies layer representations rather than compression or efficient serving.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
AI safety and reliability in deployment
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Focuses on internal linguistic representation rather than deployment safety.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Performs representational layer analysis, not agentic planning or tools.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
LLM evaluation and benchmarks
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Examines internal interpretability probing rather than LLM benchmarking.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Analyzes text models without image, audio, or video modalities.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not evaluate retrieval-augmented generation or knowledge retrieval.
Do LLMs differentiate linguistic traits internally?: A layer-wise analysis
The paper conducts layer-wise representational analysis to determine how language models internally distinguish conventional meanings from idiomatic traits.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Analyzes linguistic trait embeddings, not code generation.
Do correct answers have stable latent knowledge support?
The paper proposes stability metrics to measure whether correct outputs in language models are backed by stable internal knowledge representations.
Preprint
Multimodal models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Evaluates text-based models across factual queries without multimodal inputs.
Do correct answers have stable latent knowledge support?
The paper proposes stability metrics to measure whether correct outputs in language models are backed by stable internal knowledge representations.
Preprint
LLMs for code
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Examines factual and math stability, not software code generation.
Do correct answers have stable latent knowledge support?
The paper proposes stability metrics to measure whether correct outputs in language models are backed by stable internal knowledge representations.
Preprint
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Studies internal parametric representations rather than retrieval-augmented generation.
Do correct answers have stable latent knowledge support?
The paper proposes stability metrics to measure whether correct outputs in language models are backed by stable internal knowledge representations.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not address model pruning, distillation, or serving efficiency.
Do correct answers have stable latent knowledge support?
The paper proposes stability metrics to measure whether correct outputs in language models are backed by stable internal knowledge representations.
Preprint
AI agents
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Investigates latent state representations, not multi-step agent frameworks.
From Candidate Tokens to Final Outcomes: Decoding Relative Long-Horizon Candidate Value from Reasoning Model Representations
The paper constructs a dataset to show that relative candidate token value in multi-step reasoning is linearly decodable from model representations.
Preprint
Small and efficient models
via arxiv · 15 Oct, 06:18
Not relevant
Does not study model compression, distillation, or inference optimization.
10,621–10,680 of 17,313← PreviousNext →